. See the Mailing List page for more details.
With five years of organized conferences in the history books, this year's theme, appropriately, is Older But Wiser. Four years ago, presenters at the first Metricon discussed software security, benchmarking, identity management, enterprise case studies and many other topics. Since then, researchers and enterprises have continued to investigate new techniques. What have we learned? Given that we are trying to measure, measuring the security metrics field (and the success or failures of our own efforts) is also our responsibility.
The program is organized along three temporal perspectives:
Metricon 5 will be a one-day event, Tuesday, August 10th, 2010, co-located with the 19th USENIX Security Symposium in Washington, DC (http://www.usenix.org/events/sec10/). Metricon will begin bright and early in the morning, continue through a catered lunch in meeting room, and extend into the evening with informal discussion. Attendance will be by invitation. Capacity is limited to 60 participants.
All participants will be expected to "come with findings" and be willing to contribute to group discussions. Politeness will be praised; questions, encouraged; lurkers, flushed out.
The proceedings of all past meetings are available here:
For speakers
; the original CFP
remains available as well.
. See the MetriCon 4.0
page for the details of the meeting, including its CFP, the final agenda, and the meeting's Digest.
; the original CFP
remains available as well. Sadly, no Digest was ever completed.
.
The open and free read-only catalog that you can explore.
The commercial site where you can sign up for a free trial and create your own catalog. In addition, you can view the Center for Internet Security
Consensus metrics with a trial account.
General information about the Metrics Catalog can be found in the following documents:
BEWARE: You will need a Javascript and Java enabled browser to optimally experience the content on these sites. Due to circumstances beyond our control, we cannot support any browser on Vista.
--Elizabeth Nichols
, 3-July-2009
Logged in? Add a New entry to this blog!
Last week my Yankee Group research report "The Web 2.0 Security Train Wreck"
went live on the Yankee website, and is available to our customers. Douglas Crockford, a very smart and informed web application expert at Yahoo, who I interviewed for the report, gave it a generally positive review
. I sent him a courtesy copy, as is our practice.
However, he also states that I got some things wrong. If you read his critique, he faults me for not pointing out that there's not much more broken in Web 2.0 that wasn't already broken. He is right in the sense that the problems are rooted in well-known anti-patterns — notably, ignorance of good security design. That's true of "1.0" apps too (and, I point this out).
What is different is that the Web 2.0 architectural style makes it easier and faster to hose yourself than ever before due to the fact that JavaScript is pretty much essential for any significant application.
I am reminded of the Simpsons episode where Homer decides to legally change his name to accelerate his career prospects. He settles on the name "Max Power" because it was on his hairdryer. At the dinner table that night, he lectures Bart:
"Boy, if there's one thing you should know, it's this. There's the right way, the wrong way, and the Max Power way."
"Uh Dad, isn't that the wrong way?"
"Yeah son, but FASTER."
From a security design standpoint, "Web 2.0" is the wrong way, but faster.
To log in to the Securitymetrics.org website, create a profile
first.
| MiniMetricon2.5 Agenda Final.pdf | ![]() |
71221 bytes |
| MM35 Draft Agenda.pdf | ![]() |
105735 bytes |
| metricon5 - jaquith - welcome.ppt | ![]() |
1569792 bytes |
| Agenda Draft v2.pdf | ![]() |
105915 bytes |
| metricon40.cfp.pdf | ![]() |
56256 bytes |
| post-event-survey.pdf | ![]() |
116492 bytes |